CaseMinister
CaseMinister › Judgments › Supreme Court › 2009 › D.D. Vaishnav v. State of M.P. .

D.D. Vaishnav v. State of M.P. .

Supreme Court of India · 27 January 2009

Court
Supreme Court of India
Decided
27 January 2009
Case no.
C.A. No. 449 of 2009
Bench
Tarun Chatterjee, H.L. Dattu
Length
3 pages
Have a question about this judgment?

Ask our Legal AI about it on WhatsApp: free, no signup, in English or Hindi.

Write it first.

                          
     


                    

 
   
          

 
    
          
        ! " # 
 $ %   & &’  #    ( %

   )  *) +
                  ,
- -. / /) "

   

" )" .  #     ) 0 "* .   
, .  - 0 . "

        

&
. )+.  )  ". 0

2.
*     )  ) - - .) /  # 1  )   0 .   0) ".0  & " #

! !  "2   ’
 -)   .0  34  "*.    *   ! "  #

   ) "  )3) / - !    5  " - -. )/     &&  #

 ’  # /. 0 !0 .   . 6"   7 &8 #  "*.    

6 6*)   4) 4) / ) 4)  79*) 0   4)4 )  .. "*  :

- -. ) /8   0*   4) 12     ;2  34  <*6 *  "*.

 +     . 6*  #  "*.    *   ! "  *)0

. =. 6". 0 "*.  ) --/  6) "   #   6  0  )"    #

0. /) 4  #  ;(  0) 4   #/  "*.  )- -. ) / ) ) "  )  0 .   0) ". 0   "* # 6" 3. 2   ; #  "*.  /. )  .0  /.   ! 0 .  #  "*.  *  ! "  5   78  ’ (>;  #    

? 5.  *)+.  *.) 0 "*.  / .) . 0 6 ! . /  #   "*.

-) " .  ) 0  .@) 1 . 0 "*.  1 -! . 0 0 .   ) <. //  )  "*.  )- - / 6) "  #   6 0 ) "  #

0. /) 4  # /  "*.  )- -. )/    )+  .@)1 .0 "*.  ) +. 1 . "  1) 0.   "*.  ) -- / 6) "  #  6 0 ) "  #  0. / ) 4   #/  "*.  )- -. ) / ) 0 ) #".  *. )   "*.  / . ) . 0  6 ! ./  #  "*.  - )  " . 2  <.  ).  ) " # .0  "*)"  "*. )- -/ 6) "  #   6 0 ) "  # 0./ ) 4 #  ;( 

0) 4   - .# .    "*.  )- - . )/  1! "  3. )/ / <.0  )  "*.  " )" . 1. "   "*.  ) --/ 6) " #   6 0 )"  #  0./ ) 42  !  +.< 2 0 6 "" !" .  !# #6 . "  6) ! .   " - .# .   "*.  )- -. ) /  < "*  "*.  - . 0 # / 1 ")"    6 6 0 /4 2  "*.  )- -/ 6 ) " #   6 0 )"  #  0./ ) 4  - .# .    "*. )- -. ) /   ) / / <. 0 ) 0  "*.  1- ! .0   0.   . " ) 0.        

 * .  ) - - .) /  2  "*.  .#  . 2  ) / / < . 0  "  "*.

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

, , , , , , , , , , ,
 
                  %

  5   D                                 ,, , , , , , , , , ,         E ’ 2                                              %

Ask CaseMinister about D.D. Vaishnav v. State of M.P. .

Your 24×7 legal assistant on WhatsApp answers with the judgments that apply, in English or Hindi. No signup needed.

Questions about this judgment, or a case like it?Ask on WhatsApp