CaseMinister
CaseMinister › Judgments › Supreme Court › 2019 › Col. Rajnish Bhandari v. Union of India

Col. Rajnish Bhandari v. Union of India

Supreme Court of India · 2 August 2019 · [2019] 11 S.C.R. 157

Court
Supreme Court of India
Decided
2 August 2019
Case no.
C.A. No.-003204 - 2019
Reported as
[2019] 11 S.C.R. 157
Result
Appeal(s) allowed
Bench
Rohinton Fali Nariman, Surya Kant
Length
3 pages
Have a question about this judgment?

Ask our Legal AI about it on WhatsApp: free, no signup, in English or Hindi.

Write it first.

‘REPORTABLE’
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 3204 OF 2019

COL. RAJNISH BHANDARI, VSM Appellant(s)

VERSUS

UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)

JUDGMENT

R. F. NARIMAN, J.

Having heard learned counsel for both the parties and having perused Section 497 of the Ranbir Penal Code, 1932, applicable to the State of Jammu and Kashmir, we are of the view that, given our judgment in Joseph Shine v. Union of India (2019) 3 SCC 39, the pari materia provision contained in Section 497 of the Ranbir Penal Code be also declared as violative of Part III of the Constitution of India. The sentence “In such case the wife shall be punishable as an abettor”, which does not occur in Section 497 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, cannot stand by itself in view of the fact that the expression used is ‘In such case’. The entire Section is, therefore, declared to be unconstitutional. The fact that this statement of law in the Ranbir Penal Code is the exact opposite of the statement of law, so far as the wife is concerned, of that contained in the Indian Penal CIVIL APPEAL NO. 3204 OF 2019 Code, 1860, is of no consequence.

We are, therefore, of the view that nothing survives against the appellant on charges relatable to Section 497 Penal Code. So far as Section 63 of the Army Act, 1950, is concerned, the appellant has already been acquitted, subject to confirmation. The Armed Forces Tribunal judgment dated 08.01.2019 is, therefore, set aside. The appeal stands allowed.

However, it is made clear that the confirmation proceedings, so far as the offence under Section 63 of the Army Act, 1950, is concerned, may go on and reach its logical conclusion.

…………………………………………………………., J.
[ R. F. NARIMAN ]

…………………………………………………………., J.
[ SURYA KANT ]

New Delhi;
August 02, 2019.

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 3204 OF 2019 ITEM NO.54 COURT NO.5 SECTION XVII SUPREME COURT O F INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No. 3204/2019 COL. RAJNISH BHANDARI, VSM Appellant(s)

VERSUS

UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (With IA No.40443/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.40445/2019-EX-PARTE STAY and IA No.40444/2019- EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IA No.40442/2019-PERMISSION TO FILE SYNOPSIS AND LIST OF DATES) Date : 02-08-2019 This appeal was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT For Appellant(s) Ms. Meenakshi Arora, Sr. Adv. Ms. Neela Gokhale, Adv. Ms. Sahrdha Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Elam Pradi, Adv. Mr. R. P. Chhibber, Adv. Ms. Kamakshi S. Mehlwal, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. R. Balasubramanian, Sr. Adv. Mr. Bharat Singh, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following ORDER

The appeal stands allowed in terms of the signed reportable judgment.

Pending applications stand disposed of.

(NIDHI AHUJA) (RENU DIWAN) COURT MASTER (SH) ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

[Signed reportable judgment is placed on the file.]

Ask CaseMinister about Col. Rajnish Bhandari v. Union of India

Your 24×7 legal assistant on WhatsApp answers with the judgments that apply, in English or Hindi. No signup needed.

Questions about this judgment, or a case like it?Ask on WhatsApp