CaseMinister
CaseMinister › Judgments › Supreme Court › 1996 › Chikkathayamma v. R.balakrishnappa .

Chikkathayamma v. R.balakrishnappa .

Supreme Court of India · 23 July 1996 · [1996] SUPP. 3 S.C.R. 845

Court
Supreme Court of India
Decided
23 July 1996
Case no.
C.A. No. 6149 of 1983
Reported as
[1996] SUPP. 3 S.C.R. 845
Result
Disposed of
Bench
Ramaswamy, K.
Length
3 pages
Have a question about this judgment?

Ask our Legal AI about it on WhatsApp: free, no signup, in English or Hindi.

Write it first.

PETITIONER:
CHIKKATAYAMMA & ORS
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
R. BALAKRISHNAPPA & ORS
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 23/07/1996
BENCH:
RAMASWAMY, K.
G.B. PATTANAIK (J)
CITATION:
JT 1996 (7) 434

ACT

HEADNOTE

JUDGMENT

ORDER

Application for impleadment is ordered.

We are happy to note that pursuant to the observation made by this Court on January 16, 1996 the parties have settled the dispute and filed their compromise Memo before us. We receive the Compromise Memo which reads as under:

"(a) 2 acres 20 Gunthas in ’B’

Schedule property out of 6 acres 8

gunthas in Survey No. 194 as

mentioned in Item No. 3 above,

where a 30 feet road goes in the

centre of the said properly form

North to south side and Vijayappa

will retain to himself as his share

2 acres 20 gunthas towards the

Western side of the road towards

the North side of the Survey No.

194 and the remaining portion goes

to the Respondent R.

Balakrishanappa, Vijayappa and

Balkrishnappa each has to leave 15

feet for the formation of 30 feet

road at the centre, which goes from

North to South of the property from

their individual share which they

get in Survey No. 194 which run

from East to West should be

retained and should be used as

commo passage for all.

(b) 3 acres 18 gunthas in Survey

No. 10 as mentioned in ’D’

schedule.

(c) House property as mentioned in

’F’ schedule.

(2) The following properties will

remain with Shri H. Nagarajappa,

the Appellant No. 6 harein, the

properties which he had purchased

from the Appellants herein by

registered Sale Deeds dated

10.4.1961, to the extent of 4 acres

8 gunthas out of 6 acres 8 gunthas

from Survey no 15, which has

already been alienated by H.

Nagarajappa in favour of his son

Malikarjunappa.

(3) From Survey No. 194 R.

Vijayappa had sold 1 acre and 8

Gunthas to N. Malikarjunappa son of

H. Nagarajappa, Appellant No. 6

herein, for a sum of Rs. 50,000/-

by way of Sale Deed dated

24.6.1995. It is hereby agreed that

the said Malikarjunappa will sell

the said land back to Vijayappa for

the same amount of Rs. 50,000/- and

that Vijayappa will get the said

land registered in his name after

this Hon’ble Court passes the Order

in terms of this Compromise

Application.

(4) The following properties will

go to Balkrishnappa, Respondent

No.1 herein, out of the petition

properties.

(a) 3 acres 26 gunthas in ’B’

Schedule property i Survey No. 194

which is the remaining portion of

the said schedule property, after

R. Vijayappa, the Appellant No. 4

herein retains 2 acres 20 gunthas

as his share.

It is also hereby agreed that both

Vijayappa and Balkrishnappa each

have to lave 15 feet from their

individual share out of this Survey

Number for the Purpose of the rode

to formed at the centre of the

property and further the existing

road form East From to West would

retained and used as common passage

for all.

(b) Remaining 2 acres in ’A’

Schedule property to the South side

of the property from Survey No.15.

(c) 0.25 Gunthas in ’C’ schedule

property in Survey No.82; and

(d) House Property in ’E’ Schedule

property.

7. Rethnamma, the Appellant No. 3

and Girijamma, appellant No. 5 have

also consented for the division of

the said Schedule property as they

have no claim over the petition

schedule properties."

The appeal is disposed of in terms of the Compromise Memo, In that view of the matter, the respondent has no manner of right or interest in respect of the claim and in respect of the interest held by the appellants 4 and 6. No costs.

Ask CaseMinister about Chikkathayamma v. R.balakrishnappa .

Your 24×7 legal assistant on WhatsApp answers with the judgments that apply, in English or Hindi. No signup needed.

Questions about this judgment, or a case like it?Ask on WhatsApp