CaseMinister
CaseMinister › Judgments › Supreme Court › 2011 › Chepuri Ashok v. Prayaka Rao Venukumar

Chepuri Ashok v. Prayaka Rao Venukumar

Supreme Court of India · 16 March 2011

Court
Supreme Court of India
Decided
16 March 2011
Case no.
Crl.A. No. 103 of 2009
Bench
Harjit Singh Bedi, Chandramauli Kr. Prasad
Length
3 pages
Have a question about this judgment?

Ask our Legal AI about it on WhatsApp: free, no signup, in English or Hindi.

Write it first.

Crl.A. No.103 of 2009

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 103 of 2005

CHEPURI ASHOK & ANR.
.....
APPELLANTS

VERSUS

PRAYAKA RAO VENUKUMAR & ANR.
..... RESPONDENTS

ORDER

1. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties.

2. The appellants before us are partners Nos. 7 and 8 Ashok and Krishna Kumari, as per the partnership deed dated 8th January, 2001. From Clauses 8 and 9 of the partnership deed, it is apparent that the partners other than the appellants were in fact conducting the day to day business of the partnership and that the appellants were infact sleeping partners. In the First Information Report as also the Protest Petition filed by the complainants there is no allegation whatsoever that the appellants had in any manner misconducted themselves and the only broad allegation was that the Statement of Accounts that the complainant was entitled to receive was not being shown to him.

3. In the course of arguments, before us, the learned Crl.A. No.103 of 2009

counsel for the complainant has argued that the appellants were in fact running the business although the partnership deed did not indicate so. We have gone through the statement made by the complainant in the Protest Petition and find there is no such allegation against the appellants even in that statement. The only allegation which is made against the appellants and admitted by them is that they were partners in the firm. On this score. there is no dispute between the parties. An over all reading of the complainant, the First Information Report, the Protest Petition and the documents on record, indicate that the appellants had no role to play in any kind of criminal misconduct.

4. We, therefore, allow this appeal, set aside the order of the High Court and direct that no further proceedings shall go on against the appellants. We, however, clarify that notwithstanding this order, it would be open to the complainant to take all steps on the civil side for vindicating his claim.

..............................J
[HARJIT SINGH BEDI]

..............................J Crl.A. No.103 of 2009

[CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD]

NEW DELHI
MARCH 16, 2011.

Ask CaseMinister about Chepuri Ashok v. Prayaka Rao Venukumar

Your 24×7 legal assistant on WhatsApp answers with the judgments that apply, in English or Hindi. No signup needed.

Questions about this judgment, or a case like it?Ask on WhatsApp