CaseMinister
CaseMinister › Judgments › Supreme Court › 1998 › Central Board of Sec. Education v. Nikhil Gulati

Central Board of Sec. Education v. Nikhil Gulati

Supreme Court of India · 13 February 1998

Court
Supreme Court of India
Decided
13 February 1998
Case no.
SLP(C) No. 18853 of 1997
Bench
Cji, B.N. Kirpal, M. Srinivasan
Length
1 pages
Have a question about this judgment?

Ask our Legal AI about it on WhatsApp: free, no signup, in English or Hindi.

Write it first.

PETITIONER:
CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
NIKHIL GULATI & ANR.
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 13/02/1998
BENCH:
CJI, B.N. KIRPAL, M. SRINIVASAN

ACT

HEADNOTE

JUDGMENT

(WITH SLPs 19513 & 19057/1997)

THE 13TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1998 Present:

Hon’ble the Chief Justice

Hon’ble Mr. Justice B. N. Kirpal

Hon’ble Justice M. Srinivasan Mr. T.C. Sharma, Ms. Neelam Sharma, Mr. Ajay Sharma and Mr. Rupesh Kumar, Advocates for the petitioner. Mr. S. K. Jain and Mr.A.P. Dhamija, Advocates for the respondents.

ORDER

The following Order of the Court was delivered: (WITH SLPs 19513 & 19057/1997)

Occasional aberrations such as these, whereby ineligible students are permitted, under court orders, to undertake Board and/or University examinations, have caught the attention of this Court many a time. To add to it further, the courts have almost always observed that the instance of such aberrations should not be treated as a precedent in future. Such casual discretions by the Court is nothing but an abuse of the process; more so when the High Court at its level itself becomes conscious that the decision was wrong and was not worth repeating as a precedent. And yet it is repeated time and again. Having said this much, we hope and trust that unless the High Court can justify its decision on principle and precept, it should better desist from passing such orders, for it puts the ’Rule of Law’ to a mockery, and promotes rather the ’Rule of Man’.

All the same, fond hopes were raised in the minds of the students, herein, Therefore, we decline to interfere under Article 136 of the Constitution. The S.L.Ps. are, accordingly, dismissed.

Ask CaseMinister about Central Board of Sec. Education v. Nikhil Gulati

Your 24×7 legal assistant on WhatsApp answers with the judgments that apply, in English or Hindi. No signup needed.

Questions about this judgment, or a case like it?Ask on WhatsApp