CaseMinister
CaseMinister › Judgments › Supreme Court › 1997 › C.S. Joshi v. Iit, Kanpur

C.S. Joshi v. Iit, Kanpur

Supreme Court of India · 21 March 1997 · [1997] 3 S.C.R. 333

Court
Supreme Court of India
Decided
21 March 1997
Case no.
C.A. No. 2553 of 1997
Reported as
[1997] 3 S.C.R. 333
Result
Leave Granted & Dismissed
Bench
K. Ramaswamy, K.T. Thomas
Length
1 pages
Have a question about this judgment?

Ask our Legal AI about it on WhatsApp: free, no signup, in English or Hindi.

Write it first.

PETITIONER:
C.S. JOSHI
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
IIT, KANPUR & ANR.
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 21/03/1997
BENCH:
K. RAMASWAMY, K.T. THOMAS

ACT

HEADNOTE

JUDGMENT

ORDER

Leave granted.

This appeal by special leave arises from the judgment of the learned single Judge of the Allahabad High Court, made on March 29, 1996 in Civil Misc. Writ Petition NO. 8106/86.

The appellant, while working as Lower Division Clerk, is side to have fabricated the record and misappropriated the fund the respondent Institution. As a result show case notice was issued and he was removed from service. Subsequently, on a reference under Section 4-K of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, The Labour court had in the award directed reinstatement of the appellant with 50% of the back-wages. Thereon, the respondent filled the writ petition. Similarly, the appellant also filed the writ petition. Both the writ petitions came to have been decided on different dates. The write petition filed by the respondent-institution had come up in the first instance where the learned single judge, while maintaining the order of reinstatement, ordered reducing the back-wages to 25%. When the writ petition of the appellant had come up, the learned Judge directed payment of 100% back-wages. The matter was carried in appeal to this Court. This Court set aside both the orders and remitted the matter for reconsideration. After remand, the learned single Judge considered the matter and restored the order passed by him on the writ petition filed by the respondent - management and dismissed the writ petition of the appellant. Thus, this appeal by special leave.

The learned Judge felt it, in his discretion, to be expedient that 25% of the back-wages would meet the ends of justice. It being a discretionary order, we think that no useful purpose would be served for further remittance.

The appeal is accordingly dismissed. No costs.

Ask CaseMinister about C.S. Joshi v. Iit, Kanpur

Your 24×7 legal assistant on WhatsApp answers with the judgments that apply, in English or Hindi. No signup needed.

Questions about this judgment, or a case like it?Ask on WhatsApp