CaseMinister
CaseMinister › Judgments › Supreme Court › 2018 › C. Baby v. C. Kuppusamy

C. Baby v. C. Kuppusamy

Supreme Court of India · 3 October 2018

Court
Supreme Court of India
Decided
3 October 2018
Case no.
C.A. No. 10184 of 2018
Bench
Kurian Joseph, A.M. Khanwilkar
Author
Kurian Joseph
Length
3 pages
Have a question about this judgment?

Ask our Legal AI about it on WhatsApp: free, no signup, in English or Hindi.

Write it first.

NON-REPORTABLE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 10184/2018

(ARISING FROM SLP (C) NOS.18781/2017)

C. BABY APPELLANT(S)

VERSUS

C. KUPPUSAMY & ORS. RESPONDENT(S)

JUDGMENT

KURIAN, J.

Leave granted.

2. The appellant and respondent Nos. 1 to 3 belong to the same family. Respondent No.2 is the mother and respondent Nos.1 and 3 are her children. The dispute essentially is on partition. When the parties appeared before us, on 01.10.2018, having sensed an element of settlement, we ascertained from them as to whether they were willing to make an attempt for settlement. Being positive to our query, we requested Mr. S. Nagamuthu, learned senior counsel, to mediate, to which he graciously agreed.

3. Today, it is reported that the parties have amicably settled disputes among them. A Memorandum of Settlement signed by the parties and their respective counsel, on 03.10.2018, is also produced, which is taken on record.

4. This appeal is disposed of in terms of the Memorandum of Settlement, referred to above, which shall form part of this judgment. We direct the Trial Court to dispose of the Suit pending before it, in terms of the Memorandum of Settlement.

5. We record our deep appreciation for the sincere efforts taken by Mr. S. Nagamuthu, learned senior counsel. Though, the learned senior counsel has declined any remuneration, we deem it appropriate to fix an appropriate remuneration to be paid to him. Accordingly, an amount of Rs.2,00,000/- (Rupees Two Lacs) be paid to the learned senior counsel, which shall be shared equally between the parties.

6. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.

7. There shall be no orders as to costs.

.......................J. [KURIAN JOSEPH]

.......................J. [A.M. KHANWILKAR] NEW DELHI; OCTOBER 03, 2018.

Ask CaseMinister about C. Baby v. C. Kuppusamy

Your 24×7 legal assistant on WhatsApp answers with the judgments that apply, in English or Hindi. No signup needed.

Questions about this judgment, or a case like it?Ask on WhatsApp