CaseMinister
CaseMinister › Judgments › Supreme Court › 2017 › Budh Ram v. State of Haryana .

Budh Ram v. State of Haryana .

Supreme Court of India · 27 January 2017

Court
Supreme Court of India
Decided
27 January 2017
Case no.
C.A. No. 1036 of 2017
Bench
Kurian Joseph, A.M. Khanwilkar
Length
2 pages
Have a question about this judgment?

Ask our Legal AI about it on WhatsApp: free, no signup, in English or Hindi.

Write it first.

JUDGMENT

NON-REPORTABLE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPEAL NO.1036 OF 2017

[ARISING FROM SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO.36446/2016]

BUDH RAM AND ORS. APPELLANT(S) VERSUS

STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.1037/2017 @ SLP(C) No. 36447/2016

JUDGMENT

KURIAN, J.

Leave granted.

2. It is the undisputed case of the appellants that they are similarly situated as the appellants covered by the order of this Court dated 17.11.2016 passed in Civil Appeal Nos.11005-11042 of 2016 titled Piyara Singh and Another Etc., v. State of Haryana & Ors. Etc., wherein this Court has taken a view that the 12% increase is to be granted cumulatively from the year 2000 itself and that there should be no cut.

3. The same judgment will apply in the case of the appellants as well.

4. The appeals are allowed to the above extent and the directions granted in the order referred to above shall hold good for these appeals also.

5. However, it is made clear that the appellants shall not be entitled to any statutory benefits for the period covered by the delay.

JUDGMENT

6. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

7. There shall be no orders as to costs.

.......................J. [KURIAN JOSEPH] .......................J. [A.M. KHANWILKAR] NEW DELHI; JANUARY 27, 2017.

Ask CaseMinister about Budh Ram v. State of Haryana .

Your 24×7 legal assistant on WhatsApp answers with the judgments that apply, in English or Hindi. No signup needed.

Questions about this judgment, or a case like it?Ask on WhatsApp