CaseMinister
CaseMinister › Judgments › Supreme Court › 2010 › Bhagwan T Shinde v. Hindustan Spinning & Weaving Mil.ld.&ors

Bhagwan T Shinde v. Hindustan Spinning & Weaving Mil.ld.&ors

Supreme Court of India · 19 November 2010

Court
Supreme Court of India
Decided
19 November 2010
Case no.
C.A. No. 9758-9760 of 2010
Bench
Dalveer Bhandari, Deepak Verma
Length
2 pages
Have a question about this judgment?

Ask our Legal AI about it on WhatsApp: free, no signup, in English or Hindi.

Write it first.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPEAL NOS.9758-9760 OF 2010
(@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION(C)NOS.1264-1266 OF 2010)

BHAGWAN T SHINDE & ORS. Appellant(s)

VERSUS

HINDUSTAN SPINNING & WEAVING MIL.LD.&ORS Respondent(s)

ORDER

Application for impleadment is dismissed.

Delay condoned.

Leave granted.

Heard learned counsel for the parties. During the pendency of these matters, the parties have amicably settled the matters. Learned counsel appearing for the workmen submits that all the remaining 50 petitioners-workmen will accept the same terms and conditions which were extended to other workmen by the management. The amount is already deposited with the Labour Commissioner, Mumbai – respondent no.3 herein. Mr.N.M.Ganguly, learned counsel for the workmen, who is present in Court, undertakes to identify these workmen and on identification from him, the amount would be released to these workmen.

Learned counsel submitted that during the pendency of these matters, three workmen, namely Mr.Ebrahim Dawood Gadkari, petitioner no.16 herein, Mr.Dilip Tukaram Kambli-petitioner no.32 herein and Mr.Ramjit Ramshiroman Mishra-petitioner no.40 herein, have expired. Their legal representatives may file indemnity bonds with affidavits before the Labour Commissioner, Mumbai and on

:2:

receiving the same, the amount would be released to the legal heirs of these three workmen. A copy of the same be given to learned counsel for respondent no.1. No further directions are necessary in these appeals. These appeals are, accordingly, disposed of, leaving the parties to bear their own costs.

...................J.

(DALVEER BHANDARI)

...................J.

(DEEPAK VERMA)

NEW DELHI;
19TH NOVEMBER, 2010

Ask CaseMinister about Bhagwan T Shinde v. Hindustan Spinning & Weaving Mil.ld.&ors

Your 24×7 legal assistant on WhatsApp answers with the judgments that apply, in English or Hindi. No signup needed.

Questions about this judgment, or a case like it?Ask on WhatsApp