CaseMinister
CaseMinister › Judgments › Supreme Court › 2001 › Baldev Raj Taneja v. Bimal Kumar Kejriwal (huf) & Ors.

Baldev Raj Taneja v. Bimal Kumar Kejriwal (huf) & Ors.

Supreme Court of India · 14 September 2001

Court
Supreme Court of India
Decided
14 September 2001
Length
1 pages
Have a question about this judgment?

Ask our Legal AI about it on WhatsApp: free, no signup, in English or Hindi.

Write it first.

CASE NO.:
Special Leave Petition (crl.) 411 of 2001
PETITIONER:
BALDEV RAJ TANEJA
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
BIMAL KUMAR KEJRIWAL (HUF) & ORS.
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 14/09/2001
BENCH:
D.P.Mohapatra & K.G.Balakrishnan

JUDGMENT

D E R

This Special Leave Petition has been filed by the complainant against the revisional order dated 21st March, 1997 of the High Court of Calcutta in Criminal Revision No.194 of 1997 in which the learned single Judge (Justice S.K.Tiwari) while confirming the order of the learned Magistrate refusing to take cognizance of the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, observed that the learned Magistrate should have taken cognizance of the offence punishable under Section 420 IPC and set aside the order and directed the learned Magistrate to hold further enquiry into the complaint. The SLP is delayed by 1233 days. The inordinate delay in filing the SLP has not been satisfactorily explained. Therefore, the SLP is dismissed on the ground of delay. ........................J. (D.P.Mohapatra) ........................J. (K.G.Balakrishnan) New Delhi; 14.9. 2001

Ask CaseMinister about Baldev Raj Taneja v. Bimal Kumar Kejriwal (huf) & Ors.

Your 24×7 legal assistant on WhatsApp answers with the judgments that apply, in English or Hindi. No signup needed.

Questions about this judgment, or a case like it?Ask on WhatsApp