CaseMinister
CaseMinister › Judgments › Supreme Court › 2017 › Arvind Kumar Gupta v. Principal Secretary, M/O H.

Arvind Kumar Gupta v. Principal Secretary, M/O H.

Supreme Court of India · 20 July 2017

Court
Supreme Court of India
Decided
20 July 2017
Case no.
C.A. No. 9390 of 2013
Bench
Kurian Joseph, R. Banumathi
Author
Kurian Joseph
Length
2 pages
Have a question about this judgment?

Ask our Legal AI about it on WhatsApp: free, no signup, in English or Hindi.

Write it first.

NON-REPORTABLE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 9390 OF 2013

ARVIND KUMAR GUPTA Appellant(s)

VERSUS

PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MEDICAL HEALTH
& FAMILY WELFARE UTTARAKHAND & ORS. Respondent(s)

JUDGMENT

KURIAN, J.

1) Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties.

2) The appellant has been pursuing his grievance with regard to allocation of his services pursuant to the bifurcation of the State of Uttar Pradesh under the Uttar Pradesh Re-Organisation Act, 2000.

3) At the relevant time, he was working as a Drug Inspector. Though he was allotted to Uttarakhand, he wanted to continue in Uttar Pradesh on personal grounds. Ever since such allocation in 2007, he has been continuing in the State of Uttar Pradesh.

4) Since the appellant has rendered long and uninterrupted service in the State of Uttar Pradesh, we do not think that, at this stage, the appellant should be disturbed.

5) Accordingly, the appeal is disposed of.

6) We make it very clear that for all purposes, the appellant shall be treated as an employee of Uttar Pradesh.

7) Needless to say that he shall be entitled to all the consequential benefits pursuant to his initial appointment in the year 1999.

.......................... J.
(KURIAN JOSEPH)

.......................... J. (R. BANUMATHI) New Delhi; July 20, 2017.

Ask CaseMinister about Arvind Kumar Gupta v. Principal Secretary, M/O H.

Your 24×7 legal assistant on WhatsApp answers with the judgments that apply, in English or Hindi. No signup needed.

Questions about this judgment, or a case like it?Ask on WhatsApp