CaseMinister
CaseMinister › Judgments › Supreme Court › 2018 › Arun Kumar Jha v. Ranvir Singh

Arun Kumar Jha v. Ranvir Singh

Supreme Court of India · 1 November 2018

Court
Supreme Court of India
Decided
1 November 2018
Case no.
C.A. No. 10880 of 2018
Bench
Kurian Joseph, A.M. Khanwilkar, The Chief Justice
Author
Kurian Joseph
Length
3 pages
Have a question about this judgment?

Ask our Legal AI about it on WhatsApp: free, no signup, in English or Hindi.

Write it first.

NON-REPORTABLE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 10880/2018
(ARISING FROM SLP (C) NOS.32552 OF 2017)

ARUN KUMAR JHA APPELLANT(S)

VERSUS

RANVIR SINGH & ANR. RESPONDENT(S)

JUDGMENT

KURIAN, J.

Leave granted.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the learned counsel for the Insurance Company. There is no appearance for respondent No.1/owner.

3. This is a case where the appellant was denied the benefit of functional disability. In view of the judgment of this Court in K. Janardhan v. United India Insurance Company Limited & Another, reported in (2008) 8 SCC 518, the law is well settled that being a driver, in the nature of injury resulting in amputation of right leg below one third the thigh, there cannot be any dispute that there is 100% functional disability. The Commissioner, Workmen Compensation has granted compensation only to the tune of Rs.3,87,187/- with penalty.

4. Learned counsel appearing for Respondent No.2/Insurance Company has vehemently contended that the benefit of the amendment introduced in the year 2009 cannot be extended to the appellant since the date of incident is prior to the amendment.

5. We are afraid that this contention cannot be appreciated since the position is covered against the respondents by a decision of this Court in Kalema Tumba v. State of Maharashtra and Another, reported in (1999) 8 SCC 257. Though the learned counsel for the appellant has pitched the claims to around Rs.20 Lacs including the penalty component and other aspects, having regard to the entire facts and circumstances of the case, we are of the view that this is a case where a further compensation of a lump sum amount of Rs.10 Lacs will be just, fair and proper. Ordered accordingly.

6. The respondent No.2/Insurance Company is directed to pay this amount of Rs.10 Lacs to the appellant, within a period of three months from today. In case, the said amount is not paid within three months from today, the appellant will be entitled to interest @ 12% per annum from the date of the accident.

7. The appeal is, accordingly, disposed of.

8. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.

9. There shall be no orders as to costs.

.......................J. [KURIAN JOSEPH]

.......................J. [A.M. KHANWILKAR]

.............................J. [DR. DHANANJAYA Y. CHANDRACHUD]

NEW DELHI;
NOVEMBER 01, 2018.

Ask CaseMinister about Arun Kumar Jha v. Ranvir Singh

Your 24×7 legal assistant on WhatsApp answers with the judgments that apply, in English or Hindi. No signup needed.

Questions about this judgment, or a case like it?Ask on WhatsApp