CaseMinister
CaseMinister › Judgments › Supreme Court › 2015 › Arshad @ Syed Ahmed Arshad v. State of Punjab

Arshad @ Syed Ahmed Arshad v. State of Punjab

Supreme Court of India · 7 September 2015

Court
Supreme Court of India
Decided
7 September 2015
Case no.
Crl.A. No. 1164 of 2015
Bench
Anil R. Dave, Adarsh Kumar Goel
Length
2 pages
Have a question about this judgment?

Ask our Legal AI about it on WhatsApp: free, no signup, in English or Hindi.

Write it first.

JUDGMENT

NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1164 OF 2015 (Arising out of SLP(Crl.)No.5861 of 2015) ARSHAD @ SYED AHMED ARSHAD ... APPELLANT(S)

VS.

STATE OF PUNJAB ... RESPONDENT(S)

JUDGMENT

ANIL R. DAVE, J.

1.
Heard the learned counsel.

2.
Leave granted.

3. Looking at the facts of the case, we direct that in the event of arrest of the appellant, he shall be enlarged on bail on the conditions which might be thought proper by the Court concerned.

4. It is further directed that the appellant shall deposit Rs.25 lakhs (Rupees Twenty Five Lakhs only) within two weeks from today and a further sum of Rs.7,50,000/- (Rupees Seven Lakhs Fifty Thousand only) within eight weeks from today, so as to make a total sum of Rs.50 lakhs (Rupees Fifty Lakhs only), with the trial court.

JUDGMENT

5. The deposit of the afore-said amount shall be without rights and contentions which might be raised by the parties. The amount so deposited shall be subject to the final order which might be passed by the trial court.

6. The amount which has been deposited with this Court shall be transmitted to the trial court.

7. The appellant shall cooperate with the investigation.

8. With the above observations, the appeal is disposed of. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of.

..............J.

[ANIL R. DAVE]

..............J. [ADARSH KUMAR GOEL] New Delhi; 7th September, 2015.

Ask CaseMinister about Arshad @ Syed Ahmed Arshad v. State of Punjab

Your 24×7 legal assistant on WhatsApp answers with the judgments that apply, in English or Hindi. No signup needed.

Questions about this judgment, or a case like it?Ask on WhatsApp