CaseMinister
CaseMinister › Judgments › Supreme Court › 2011 › Anil Kumar v. State of Haryana

Anil Kumar v. State of Haryana

Supreme Court of India · 29 August 2011

Court
Supreme Court of India
Decided
29 August 2011
Case no.
Crl.A. No. 1675 of 2011
Bench
Harjit Singh Bedi, Gyan Sudha Misra
Length
2 pages
Have a question about this judgment?

Ask our Legal AI about it on WhatsApp: free, no signup, in English or Hindi.

Write it first.

Crl.A. No. of 2011 @ SLP(Crl) 5247 of 2011

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1675 OF 2011
[ARISING OUT OF SLP (CRL) NO. 5247 OF 2011]

ANIL KUMAR
.....
APPELLANT

VERSUS

STATE OF HARYANA
.....
RESPONDENT

ORDER

None appears for the respondent-State though served.

Leave granted.

Heard the learned counsel for the appellant. Pursuant to the orders of this Court dated 15th

July, 2011, the appellant has deposited a sum of `1 lakh. The appellant was initially convicted by the trial court for an offence punishable under Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act and was awarded a sentence of two years rigorous imprisonment and payment of fine of `2,000/-. The said sentence has been reduced by the High Court from two years to three months but enhanced the fine to `10,000/- from `2,000/-. As of today, the appellant has undergone one month of the sentence.

Crl.A. No. of 2011 @ SLP(Crl) 5247 of 2011

We, accordingly, reduce the sentence of the appellant to that already undergone enhancing his fine from `10,000/- to `1 lakh.

In the light of the fact that ` 1,00,000/- has already been deposited, we reduce the sentence of the appellant to that already undergone. His bail bonds stand discharged.

The appeal stands disposed of in the above terms.

.....................J
[HARJIT SINGH BEDI]

......................J
[GYAN SUDHA MISRA]

NEW DELHI
AUGUST 29, 2011.

Ask CaseMinister about Anil Kumar v. State of Haryana

Your 24×7 legal assistant on WhatsApp answers with the judgments that apply, in English or Hindi. No signup needed.

Questions about this judgment, or a case like it?Ask on WhatsApp