CaseMinister
CaseMinister › Judgments › Supreme Court › 2008 › Amisha Hinduja v. Manish Hinduja

Amisha Hinduja v. Manish Hinduja

Supreme Court of India · 21 April 2008

Court
Supreme Court of India
Decided
21 April 2008
Case no.
T.P.(C) No. 950 of 2007
Length
1 pages
Have a question about this judgment?

Ask our Legal AI about it on WhatsApp: free, no signup, in English or Hindi.

Write it first.

CASE NO.:
Transfer Petition (civil) 950 of 2007
PETITIONER:
Amisha Hinduja
RESPONDENT:
Manish Hinduja
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 21/04/2008
BENCH:
ASHOK BHAN & DALVEER BHANDARI

JUDGMENT

JUDGMENT

ORDER TRANSFER PETITION(C) NO.950 OF 2007

Petitioner-wife has filed this transfer petition under Section 25 of the code of Civ il Procedure, 1908 seeking transfer of HMP Case No.88 of 2007 pending before the Family Court, Indore , Madhya Pradesh to the Family Court, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

Notice was issued to the husband-respondent and he is represented before us.

Counsel appearing for the respondent-husband states that there is a danger to the respondent’s life if he goes to Raipur and prays that this case be transferred to any other place than Raipur. Per contra, counsel appearing for the wife assures that no harm shall be cause d to the husband on his coming to Raipur to attend the proceedings.

On the assurance given by the counsel appearing for the wife, we transfer the afores aid case No. 88 of 2007 from the Family Court, Indore, Madhya Pradesh to the Family Court, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. We make it clear that if any untoward incident happens, the respondent is put

at liberty to approach this Court for transferring this case to a place other than Raipur.

The transferor court is directed to transmit the entire record related to the afores aid case to the transferee court forthwith.

The Transfer Petition is allowed in the above terms.

Ask CaseMinister about Amisha Hinduja v. Manish Hinduja

Your 24×7 legal assistant on WhatsApp answers with the judgments that apply, in English or Hindi. No signup needed.

Questions about this judgment, or a case like it?Ask on WhatsApp