CaseMinister
CaseMinister › Judgments › Supreme Court › 2017 › Amar Nath Neogi v. The State of Jharkhand

Amar Nath Neogi v. The State of Jharkhand

Supreme Court of India · 10 October 2017

Court
Supreme Court of India
Decided
10 October 2017
Case no.
Crl.A. No. 1758 of 2017
Bench
Kurian Joseph, R. Banumathi
Author
Kurian Joseph
Length
2 pages
Have a question about this judgment?

Ask our Legal AI about it on WhatsApp: free, no signup, in English or Hindi.

Write it first.

NON-REPORTABLE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1758 OF 2017
[@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL) NOS. 7487/2017]

AMAR NATH NEOGI
APPELLANT(S)

VERSUS

STATE OF JHARKHAND
RESPONDENT(S)

JUDGMENT

KURIAN, J.

Leave granted.

2. The appellant is an accused in Case No.680/2015 corresponding to G.R. NO.4839/2015 under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the I.P.C. We are informed that the investigation has already been completed. We also found from the records that the appellant is a senior citizen, having crossed the age of 65 years. We are also informed that he was never in Government service. We fail to understand as to why the appellant prayed for anticipatory bail in a case where final report has been filed.

3. In the above circumstances, we dispose of this appeal as follows:

The appellant shall surrender before the Court of competent jurisdiction where the final report has been filed, within two weeks from today.
On such surrender, the appellant shall be released on bail on his executing a bond to the tune of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) with two solvent sureties to the equal amount.

4. The appeal is, accordingly, disposed of.

5. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.

6. There shall be no orders as to costs.

.......................J. [KURIAN JOSEPH] .......................J. [R. BANUMATHI] NEW DELHI; OCTOBER 10, 2017.

Ask CaseMinister about Amar Nath Neogi v. The State of Jharkhand

Your 24×7 legal assistant on WhatsApp answers with the judgments that apply, in English or Hindi. No signup needed.

Questions about this judgment, or a case like it?Ask on WhatsApp