CaseMinister
CaseMinister › Judgments › Supreme Court › 1996 › Abdul Aziz Abdul Razak v. M.C. of Greater Bombay

Abdul Aziz Abdul Razak v. M.C. of Greater Bombay

Supreme Court of India · 15 February 1996 · [1996] 2 S.C.R. 747

Court
Supreme Court of India
Decided
15 February 1996
Case no.
C.A. No. 3819 of 1996
Reported as
[1996] 2 S.C.R. 747
Result
Dismissed
Bench
Ramaswamy, K.
Length
2 pages
Have a question about this judgment?

Ask our Legal AI about it on WhatsApp: free, no signup, in English or Hindi.

Write it first.

PETITIONER:
ABDUL AZIZ ABDUL RAZAK & ANR.
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
THE MUNICIPAL CORPN. OF GREATERBOMBAY & ANR.
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 15/02/1996
BENCH:
RAMASWAMY, K.
G.B. PATTANAIK (J)
CITATION:
1996 AIR 1350 JT 1996 (3) 377
1996 SCALE (2)906

ACT

HEADNOTE

JUDGMENT

ORDER

Leave granted. We have heard the counsel on both sides.

Notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act 1 of 1894 was published in 1981 and the award under Section 11 was made on May 9, 1984 awarding compensation at the rate of Rs.110/- per sq. yd. On reference under Section 18 the learned single Judge enhanced the compensation to Rs.300/ per sq. yd. by award and decree dated February 19, 1992 but disallowed interest in view of the agreement between the parties. Dissatisfied therewith, the appellant has come forward with this appeal by special leave against the order of the High Court dated July 14, 1994 in Appeal No.114/92.

The only question is whether the appellants are entitled to the interest as amended under the Amendment Act 68 of 1984. Admittedly, the appellants had entered into an agreement and the relevant part thereof reads as under:

"That the Corporation shall pay an

amount of Rs.98,480/- (Rupees

Ninety Eight Thousand Four Hundred

Eighty only) being 2/3rd of

compensation to be calculated at

the interim rates of Rs.40/- for

the said property more particularly

described in the First Schedule

hereunder written on the execution

of this agreement and the balance

amount of the compensation as may

be awarded under the Land

Acquisition Act, 1894 shall be paid

to the owners with interest thereon

at the rate of 4% per annum from

the date of possession."

A reading thereof clearly indicates that they were agreeable for payment of a sum of Rs.98,480/- only being 2/3rd of the compensation to be calculated at the rate of Rs.40/- per sq. yd. more particularly described in the First Schedule on execution of the agreement. For the balance amount they requested the authorities to award compensation under the Act, But they contracted for payment of interest at the rate of 4% per annum from the date of possession.

Sub-section (2) of Section 11 of the Act rends as under:

"(2) Notwithstanding anything

contained in sub-section (1), if at

any stage of the proceedings, the

Collector is satisfied that all the

persons interested in the land who

appeared before him have agreed in

writing on the matters to be

included in the award of the

Collector in the form prescribed by

rules made by the appropriate

Government, he may, without making

further enquiry, make an award

according to the terms of such

agreement."

Therefore, notwithstanding anything contained in subsection (1), the Land Acquisition Officer is entitled to award interest as per the contract entered into by the authorities. Though the Amendment Act has come into force giving benefit of enhanced rate of interest, the appellants are not entitled to the enhanced interest by virtue of their contract.

The appeal is accordingly dismissed. No costs.

Ask CaseMinister about Abdul Aziz Abdul Razak v. M.C. of Greater Bombay

Your 24×7 legal assistant on WhatsApp answers with the judgments that apply, in English or Hindi. No signup needed.

Questions about this judgment, or a case like it?Ask on WhatsApp